But now i wanted to use a windows computer with the same (or almost the same) program to do the same thing and I tried to use the same settings that worked (and still work) with the mac. I have used, and have to continue to exclusively use, an iMac for this and that has worked ok. I wan't to use Premiere Elements to, as fast as possible, edit a film of a lecture into a format and size that can be uploaded to a server used for such lecture films. I really don't see the point of your questions. Thank you for your support but the question seem to be unanswered, still. But that is also very inconvenient for me because I don't have that much time to edit and render each film. I will test both the mac and the windows version with variable bitrate 2 pass, and clock them. So the question remains: is it after all a main difference between the rendering on a mac (or perhaps on an Elements v14) compared to that on a windows (or yet again on an Elements v16). ![]() No, I hadn't set it to progressive from the start because I hadn't done that on the mac, but I've tested with progressive and Square pixels according to Steve Grisetti's suggestion but that didn't make any difference in file size. The aspect of the video is 4:3 (1024x768 for the target and 1440x1080 for the source). Yes, I know that it is an estimate, but 365 MB compared to 1196 MB?Īnd the estimation on the mac version is quite accurate. ![]() Three times bigger when exported from the windows version than from the mac version. But the fact is that the file size end up being very different. It shouldn't matter if it's on the mac or windows for the same version (or nearly the same version PR.E.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |